Business With Greg Mortgage and Real Estate Blog

This is a Mortgage and Real Estate blog that contains help articles related to each industry.

Blog Home Page Computers Forums Business Directory
Business With Greg Mortgage and Real Estate Blog header image 2

USDA - Rural Development

April 7th, 2008 · 2 Comments

The United States  Department of Agriculture has been offering loans for quite some time. Many area’s are approved to use this type of financing. This loan works simular to FHA or VA as far as qualifying. However, you are subject to income restrictions and geographical area’s. Not all area’s are approved for USDA.

This loan is now one of the strongest ways to finance a home in the qualified area’s. The loan provides 102% financing which allows you to finance the 2% Funding Fee.

There used to be geothermal restrictions on homes. This past year this requirement was eliminated.

If you have a 620 credit score you are Credit Approved. If you are 1 day out of bankruptcy or foreclosure and you have a 620+ you can buy a home!

There is no limit to the amount a seller can contribute to your closing costs and pre-paid items.

There is no PMI.

There is no cash reserve requirments.

There is no sourcing or seasoning of cash required to close if any. So, if you bury your money in a cookie jar that is acceptable.

So, remember this loan and ask your loan officer about it. Or if you want to check the area’s that are approved or check to see if your income qualifies then visit http://eligibility.sc.egov.usda.gov

Tags: Mortgage Related

2 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Greg // May 5, 2008 at 3:04 pm

    USDA has issued new requirements on credit scores under 580 which make it nearly impossible for someone with a credit score less than 580 to obtain financing.

  • 2 Greg // May 5, 2008 at 3:16 pm

    I have in my possession a memo dated 3/28/2008 that addresses specific guidelines for underwritting loans in today’s enviroment. It specifically addresses credit scores and credit issues. I am going to paste the memo below and please ask questions if you need clarification.

    RD AN No. 4346 (1980-D)
    March 28, 2008
    TO: All State Directors
    Rural Development
    ATTENTION: Rural Housing Program Directors,
    Guaranteed Rural Housing Specialists, and
    Area Directors, and Area Specialists
    FROM: Russell T. Davis (Signed by Russell T. Davis)
    Administrator
    Housing and Community Facilities Programs
    SUBJECT: Single Family Housing Guaranteed Loan Program
    Utilizing Credit Scores for Underwriting Single Family Housing
    Guaranteed Loans
    PURPOSE/INTENDED OUTCOME:
    The purpose of this Administrative Notice (AN) is to affirm 620 as the minimum
    Fair Isaacs & Company (FICO) credit score required for applicants to utilize
    streamlined documentation for manually underwritten guaranteed loans.
    COMPARISON WITH PREVIOUS AN:
    This AN replaces AN No. 4237 (1980-D) dated January 25, 2007. This AN
    includes new guidance for lenders when manually underwriting guaranteed loans
    with FICO scores below 620 as well as files with no credit scores. References to
    VantageScore have removed from this AN, because this credit format is not used
    within the industry to a great extent and is not acceptable for the Single Family
    Housing Guaranteed Loan Program (SFHGLP) at this time.
    EXPIRATION DATE: FILING INSTRUCTIONS:
    March 31, 2009 Preceding RD Instruction 1980-D
    BACKGROUND:
    The SFHGLP continues to evaluate both loan performance and the real estate
    lending environment. SFHGLP loans with FICO scores over 620 historically
    experience significantly lower defaults than borrowers with scores below 619.
    A recent SFHGLP portfolio review of FICO scores of 619 and below supports a
    thorough evaluation prior to extending mortgage credit:
    • FICO score 619 and below:
    * 17% of SFHGLP portfolio
    * 39% of program losses
    • No FICO score:
    * 6% of SFHGLP portfolio
    * 16% of program losses
    Lenders should judiciously evaluate and carefully screen the credit histories of
    applicants with FICO scores of 619 and below for manually underwritten
    Guaranteed loan files.
    IMPLEMENTATION RESPONSIBILITIES:
    Selecting FICO Scores
    The FICO score of the primary wage earner should be given the most emphasis;
    however FICO scores of other applicants should not be ignored. When reviewing
    appropriate credit reports select the correct FICO score for underwriting per
    these guidelines:
    Three scores: Select the middle score
    Two scores: Select the lowest score
    One score: Use that score
    No score: Non-traditional credit histories may be accepted
    Streamlined Documentation for FICO Scores of 620 or Higher
    For loan applications that contain co-applicants, each applicant must have a
    FICO score of 620 or higher to qualify for streamlined documentation.
    • A lender shall not be required to document adverse credit history
    waivers under RD Instruction 1980-D, section 1980.345(d),
    (referenced below in this AN) except for those involving a
    delinquent Federal debt or previous Agency loan.
    • A lender shall not be required to document applicant rent payment
    history.
    • No action will be necessary for any derogatory items, such as
    those outlined in RD Instruction 1980-D, section 1980.345(d),
    except for those involving a delinquent Federal debt or previous
    Agency loan.
    Note that each applicant is treated separately. If the applicant has a score higher
    than 620 and the co-applicant has a score lower than 620, then the applicant
    qualifies for streamlined documentation but the co-applicant’s credit history
    should be carefully examined.
    FICO scores are calculated based upon credit information reported to the credit
    bureaus, therefore lenders and Agency staff can be confident that FICO scores
    of 620 and higher represent acceptable credit histories.
    Applicants with FICO Scores of 619 and below
    Based upon the portfolio review of SFHGLP loans, applicants with FICO scores
    of 619 and below have a statistically higher likelihood of default. This does not
    mean applicants with FICO scores of 619 and below are poor credit risks and
    should be categorically rejected. Many loans in this category are paid as agreed.
    However, underwriters should be especially cautious of layered risks in addition
    to the lower credit score which include but are not limited to:
    • Adverse credit history waivers: Approved by the lender
    If the lender approves an adverse credit waiver for any instance of
    derogatory credit as outlined in RD Instruction 1980-D, section
    1980.345(d), the lender must secure documentation evidencing that
    the circumstances surrounding the adverse information were
    temporary in nature, and were beyond the applicant’s control, and
    have been removed so their reoccurrence is unlikely. Alternately,
    the lender must secure documentation evidencing that the delinquency
    arose from a justifiable dispute related to defective goods or services.
    • Ratio waivers: Requested by the lender, approved by Rural
    Development Ratio waivers should be avoided unless strong
    compensating factors are present (i.e. Principal, Interest, Taxes and
    Insurance (PITI) is comparable to current housing, conservative user of
    credit, strong job history, demonstrated ability to accumulate reserves,
    etc.)
    • Payment Shock: Approved by the lender
    Lenders should be cautious when applicants have no rent or housing
    history to verify, or the proposed PITI is 100% or greater than current
    rent or housing expense.
    • Questionable repayment income or job stability: Approved by the
    lender The lender is responsible for calculating income and documenting
    the loan file.
    o Applicants with commission only positions or widely varying
    amounts of overtime and bonus income may not exhibit enough
    adequate or stable monthly income to qualify.
    o Applicants with gaps in their employment histories may not exhibit
    enough dependable or stable monthly income to qualify.
    Rent History Verification
    Lenders are required to obtain a Verification of Rent (VOR) when available for all
    applicants with FICO scores of 619 and below. A 12 month history is most
    desired, however any length of payment history should be considered. Written
    verifications are preferred, but 12 months of cancelled checks covering the most
    recent 12 month period will also indicate a satisfactory payment history.
    Applicants with FICO scores of 580 and below
    Loans with FICO scores of 580 and below are very high risk and tend to exhibit a
    much higher rate of default. Lenders should not approve loans with FICO scores
    of 580 and below if they exhibit any of the indicators of unacceptable credit per
    RD Instruction 1980-D, section 1980.345(d) which include:
    • One or more debt payments being 30 days late within the last 12 months
    • Foreclosure discharged less than 36 months
    • Outstanding tax liens or delinquent government debts with no payment
    arrangements, currently due
    • Outstanding judgments within the last 12 months
    • Two or more rent payments 30 days late within the last 3 years
    • Accounts converted to collections within the last 12 months
    • Outstanding collection accounts with no payment arrangements that are
    currently due
    • Bankruptcy discharged less than 36 months
    Extraordinary compensating factors must be present to warrant a lender to issue
    an adverse credit waiver for applicants with FICO scores of 580 and below.
    Additional risk layering in addition to the lower score is not recommended.
    SUMMARY
    Loan performance and current market conditions reveal a need to revisit
    acceptable parameters for SFHGLP loans. FICO scores are excellent indicators
    of acceptable credit, however the FICO score alone does not always give an
    accurate indication of an applicant’s ability and willingness to repay a mortgage
    loan. Loan records must contain sufficient justification by the underwriter for
    approving the loan. The Uniform Underwriting ransmittal Summary is a good
    place to document this justification. The analysis should include an assessment
    of any compensating factors, or credit history explanations that establish the
    applicant’s ability and willingness to repay the proposed loan as agreed.
    SFHGLP loans that are rejected by lenders based on underwriting risk should be
    rejected based on lack of repayment ability, lack of adequate and dependable
    income, inadequate credit history, or collateral that does not meet the required
    standards.
    Lender Monitoring
    On an ongoing basis, Agency field staff should monitor originating lenders for
    adherence to SFHGLP loan underwriting requirements, including the standards
    outlined in this AN. Field staff conducting lender origination monitoring reviews
    should pay special attention to credit scores when reviewing first year
    delinquencies and early defaults.
    Questions regarding this AN may be directed to Joaquin Tremols at
    (202) 720-1452 or Kristina Zehr at (309) 452-0830 ext. 111. Their respective
    email addresses are joaquin.tremols@wdc.usda.gov and
    kristina.zehr@wdc.usda.gov.

You must log in to post a comment.