My Mortgage, Real Estate, and Credit Blog!

Posted: 15th June 2010 by Greg Phillips in Announcements

Hello, my name is Greg Phillips. I have been a Mortgage Loan Officer since 1999. I created this blog to give people an outlet that was easy to read and understand. Most of the articles on this site are written based on my professional experience.  I hope you enjoy reading my blog.

USDA RD Funding Fee Changes Effective 10/1/2011

Posted: 28th September 2011 by Greg Phillips in Mortgage Related

USDA has changed the funding fee structure on their Rural Development loans effective 10/1/2011. If USDA has not issued a conditional commitment before 10/1/2011, the loan will be subject to these new changes.

USDA currently charges 3.5% of the loan amount as a funding fee. They are lowering that amount to 2%, but will also charge a .30% annual funding fee that is charged for the LIFE OF THE LOAN! This is not classified as mortgage insurance, therefore mortgage insurance laws do not apply.  This fee structure applies to all loans, however, a refinance loan has a reduced up front funding fee that is 1% instead of 2%.

Here is a live example of how this change will impact borrower’s, and this example may help you prepare for how to calculate the charges on your own:

Before:

Purchase Price $100,000

3.5% Funding Fee adds approximately $3,500 (This amount varies based on whether you finance the fee or pay it out of pocket)

Total loan amount is $103,500 over 30 years at an interest rate of 4.00% costs $494.12 per month.

 

After:

2.0% Funding Fee adds approximately $2,000 (This amount varies based on whether you finance the fee or pay it out of pocket)

Total loan amount is $102,000 over 30 years at an interest rate of 4.00% costs $486.96 per month.

You also have to add the annual premium to that payment which is calculated like this: $102,000 x .0030 = $306 divided by 12 = $25.50 per month. $486.96 + $25.50 = $512.46 per month.

The change is fairly marginal, but it is more money monthly, and over the life of the loan.

Just for the sake of knowledge, if you finance your funding fee, the charge for the up front funding fee is calculated like this:

$100,000 divided by .980 = $102,041 (Round to the nearest cent). This would be the total loan amount with the funding fee. This example is easy because it is a round number, however, if you need to know how much the charge is exactly, just multiply $102,041 by .020 and you will get $2,041.

There have been several updates over the past few years to the guidelines that affect these derogatory events. I am going to explain what each agency requires as their minimum guideline for a loan to be insured, guaranteed, or purchased by the major housing agencies that provide loans. Bare in mind, these are the minimum requirements for each agency and that lenders can enforce stricter guidelines. If the guidelines were more lenient, the agencies would not insure, guarantee, or purchase the loan from the lenders. However, they can be more strict and this is what we in the industry call a lender overlay.

 

Conventional or Conforming Agency Loan (Fannie Mae or Freddy Mac)

The date of the loan application is what they use to determine if the proper time frame has elapsed. Foreclosures are from the date the deed goes out of your name and into the new owners name, usually a sheriff deed back to the bank unless the home sells at the auction to someone else. Extenuating circumstances are defined as non-reoccurring events beyond the borrowers control that result in a sudden decrease in pay or increase in financial obligations.

Foreclosure:

  • 7 years from the date of foreclosure with no extenuating circumstances.
  • 3 years from the date of foreclosure with extenuating circumstances, can only be owner occupied, requires a 10% down payment, and is for purchase or rate and term refinances only.

Short Sale or Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure:

  • 7 years from when the house sold for a down payment less than 10% of the new home purchase price
  • 4 years from when the house sold with a 10% down payment
  • 2 years from when the house sold with a 20% down payment
  • 2 years from when the house sold with a 10% down payment if there were extenuating circumstances

Bankruptcy Chapter 7:

  • 4 years from the discharge date
  • 2 years from the discharge date with extenuating circumstances

Bankruptcy Chapter 13:

  • 2 years from the discharge date or 4 years from the dismissal date

FHA

The date of the loan approval is what they use to determine if the proper time frame has elapsed. Foreclosures are from the date the deed goes out of your name and into the new owners name, usually a sheriff deed back to the bank unless the home sells at the auction to someone else. Extenuating circumstances are defined as a serious illness or death of a wage earner.

Foreclosure or Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure:

  • 3 years from the date of foreclosure
  • 1 year from the date of foreclosure if there were extenuating circumstances. (Most lenders do not allow less than 3 years though)

Short Sale:

  • 3 years from when the house sold
  • No waiting period if there were no late payments on any debt for 12 months prior to the short sale. (Most mortgage servicer’s require you to pay late in order to do a short sale though)

Bankruptcy Chapter 7:

  • 2 years from the discharge date and either no new credit or re-established credit (Delinquency after bankruptcy is highly discouraged. Most lenders require re-established credit and will not lend to no credit or no credit score unless a second borrower has credit)
  • 1 year from the discharge date if the bankruptcy was due to extenuating circumstances. Borrower must have re-established credit. (Most lenders will not allow less than 2 years)

Bankruptcy Chapter 13:

  • 1 year of Chapter 13 plan payments, all on time, is required. Borrower must not have any late payments, and the bankruptcy plan must be paid off.

VA

The date of the loan approval is what they use to determine if the proper time frame has elapsed. Foreclosures are from the date the deed goes out of your name and into the new owners name, usually a sheriff deed back to the bank unless the home sells at the auction to someone else. Extenuating circumstances are defined as unemployment or medical bills that are not insured.

Foreclosure or Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure:

  • 2 years from the date of foreclosure
  • 1 year from the date of foreclosure if there were extenuating circumstances, credit is re-established and paid as agreed.

Short Sale:

  • 3 years from when the house sold
  • No waiting period if there were no late payments on any debt for 12 months prior to the short sale. (Most mortgage servicer’s require you to pay late in order to do a short sale though)

Bankruptcy Chapter 7:

  • 2 years from the discharge date and either no new credit or re-established credit (Delinquency after bankruptcy is highly discouraged. Most lenders require re-established credit and will not lend to no credit or no credit score unless a second borrower has credit)
  • 1 year from the discharge date if the bankruptcy was due to extenuating circumstances. Borrower must have re-established credit. (Most lenders will not allow less than 2 years)

Bankruptcy Chapter 13:

  • 1 year of Chapter 13 plan payments, all on time, is required. Borrower must not have any late payments, and the bankruptcy plan must be paid off.

USDA

The date of the loan approval is what they use to determine if the proper time frame has elapsed. Foreclosures are from the date the deed goes out of your name and into the new owners name, usually a sheriff deed back to the bank unless the home sells at the auction to someone else. Extenuating circumstances are defined as loss of job, delayed government benefits, increased financial obligations due to death, illness, or anything out of your control. These events must be temporary and the reason for the extenuating circumstance must no longer be present.

Foreclosure, Short Sale, or Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure:

  • 3 years from the date of foreclosure, short sale, or deed in lieu of foreclosure
  • No waiting period from the date of foreclosure, short sale, or deed in lieu of foreclosure if there were extenuating circumstances. (Most lenders do not allow less than 3 years though)

Bankruptcy Chapter 7:

  • 2 years from the discharge date and either no new credit or re-established credit (Delinquency after bankruptcy is highly discouraged. Most lenders require re-established credit and will not lend to no credit or no credit score unless a second borrower has credit)
  • 1 year from the discharge date if the bankruptcy was due to extenuating circumstances. Borrower must have re-established credit. (Most lenders will not allow less than 2 years)

Bankruptcy Chapter 13:

  • 1 from the date the plan was completed and the bankruptcy discharged; whichever occurs sooner
  • No waiting period with extenuating circumstances

Most lenders are more restrictive than what the agencies establish as the minimum requirement. If your lender is more strict, either the guideline has changed which is happening pretty frequently these days or they are simply more restrictive to prevent losses on their loans.

The government is working on some new legislation that could play a key rule in further housing industry turmoil. As consumers, realtors, and mortgage professionals push for lending expansion to assist with short term housing market recovery, it appears our government is leaning toward the opposite. The FHA Rural Regulatory Improvement Act of 2011 is in the begining stages and currently seeks to do the following:

  • Raise the minimum down payment requirement from 3.5% to 5%
  • Prohibit buyers from financing their closing costs

Additional meetings will be held to discuss addtional legislation that could be added to the bill. The goal of this bill is to provide more stability and lessen the risk that the government is exposing itself too. On April 18, 2011, changes went into affect to increase FHA MIP and UFMIP to boost the FHA insurance reserves used to pay claims on bad loans to lenders. These changes have caused homebuyers payments to increase on FHA loans.

This legislation aims to reduce the number of loans that default. The more cash a home buyer put’s into a home out of their own pocket, the higher the change is that they will not default. Currently, a home buyer could obtain a gift from a relative for the 3.5% down payment and the seller could pay all of their closing costs or what most will define as financing the closing costs. It is unclear whether any changes will be proposed that eliminate or restrict allowing gift funds or seller paid closing costs, but I would anti

Today, a House Financial Service Subcommittee held a hearing to discuss GSE reform. The title of the meeting was, “GSE Reform: Immediate Steps to Protect Taxpayers and End the Bailout.” GSE’s such as Fannie Mae, Freddy Mac, FHA, USDA, VA, and various other special housing incentive programs have been debated quite a bit over the last 4 years. Since the elections are over, government is resuming GSE reform. Changes will be made, but it is unclear what will happen.

It was a meeting of the minds that included several well educated representatives who reviewed current initiatives, proposed initiatives, and also added their own idea’s. The US Treasury Department proposed three options. All of the proposal options eliminated Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac. The overall theme was for Government to reduce their involvement in issuing, insuring, or guaranteeing mortgage loans. One proposal limits government to FHA and a few other smaller programs. Another would push lending onto the private sector and only require government to be involved during housing market struggles. The third option keeps government involved and operates very similar to the way it does now, but without Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac.

These discussions are the first of many involving the newly elected government representatives. It seems republicans are standing behind the privatization of mortgage loans while democrats  prefer other solutions. I fear that if government steps out, the private market will not offer loans in their current fashion. I believe lending will tighten up again, and the private lenders I know of are all high credit score, large down payment, and require significant assets. However, government cannot continue to back the heavy losses Fannie and Freddy keep posting, so change is imminent.

Should You Rent or Buy Housing?

Posted: 29th September 2010 by Greg Phillips in Real Estate Related

Moving can be one of the most exciting yet challenging decisions to make. There are so many unique situations that create a need or desire to change housing. You can give birth to a new child, which may require an additional bedroom. Your career could require you to relocate. Maybe you are tired of the same surroundings. Whatever the case, your decision should include careful planning and analysis of your situation. Then you can make a decision that could affect the rest of your life. Should you rent, or will you buy your next residence?

ad: Here’s how real estate agents can use greeting cards to boost business.

The most common form of renting is leasing an apartment; the cost of this choice can be more stable than buying. Your landlord may pay for some or all of the utilities. The landlord assumes responsibility for repairing the apartment. The cost of insurance to protect your belongings is lower since you don’t insure the apartment itself. If your situation changes, renting makes it easier to move. Usually you give a 30 day notice, possibly pay a few months’ rent, and then you can move. Leasing your next place surely can cost less money.

There are more advantages to renting that are not financial in nature. Some apartment complexes have on-site amenities such as a swimming pool, club house, fitness center, playground, or even furnishings for your apartment. You don’t even have to landscape the property or mow the grass! All of these fabulous luxuries are included in your monthly rent payment.

Renting sounds amazing, but there are other details you should consider. An apartment can be smaller and may be attached to other units. Picture yourself in your apartment trying to enjoy a little peace and quiet. You may gaze at the walls that you are not allowed to paint. Then your neighbor decides to crank up the radio, and your quiet time is interrupted. You may dread that everywhere you look has a neighbor in sight. Your neighbors could live above, below, and on both sides of your residence. So, maybe you decide to workout instead and are inconvenienced when your favorite treadmill is already in use. You could turn to the pool for some relaxation, but a group of 10 children are playing Marco Polo, while another group is testing out their cannonball skills. You may think to yourself, “I’m tired of this restrictive living. I surely would like a place of my own.”

Owning a home can have significant financial advantages. If you are fortunate enough to buy a home with your own money, then you will not have a house payment. The monthly mortgage payment you make reduces the balance you owe. As your balance decreases, the amount of equity grows. Over time, your home value may increase due to inflation or increased demand for housing. If you play your cards right, owning a home can be a very rewarding investment.

When you purchase a home you can customize it to your liking. Some houses may come with the same amenities as an apartment. If the house does not include these leisure items, then you could add them. I am sure it would be nice to experience peace and quiet whenever you please. Imagine relaxing in your own hot tub or working out in your own exercise room. Maybe you could take a swim in your very own pool. You have so many choices and possibilities when you buy a home.

The dream of home ownership could come at a hefty price and may exhaust some of your free time. It’s your responsibility to fix anything that breaks. Whether you pay someone to do the repairs, or you do them yourself, it will cost you extra. You are responsible to pay all utility bills. All of the amenities, even if they come with the home, require extra time and money to maintain. Improvements, repairs, interest charges, and maintenance surely can be exhausting for you and your wallet.

Everyone’s situation can be different, and you can always plan ahead. Weigh everything out and think carefully before you decide. If you anticipate the additional costs and avoid overextending yourself, then you will be better prepared when buying a home. Additionally, the decision to rent an apartment may be the perfect way to maintain a consistent lifestyle. Whatever you decide, moving can be very fun and painful at the same time.

USDA Rural Housing Update On Funding And Fee Clarification

Posted: 30th August 2010 by Greg Phillips in Uncategorized

This question is asked quite a bit in the industry. “Why are lenders still not offering this program?”  In a letterdated 8/23/2010 Tammye Trevifio helps clear up some of the hold up at USDA.

The Rural Housing Preservation and Stabilization Act of 2010 allotted up to $30,000,000,ooo (thirty billion) for the 2010 fiscal year. The 2010 fiscal year ends on September 30, 2010. So, there is funding available.

The bill also has changes to the fees involved in these loans.

Currently, there is a 2% Funding Fee. This was raised to 3.5% on purchases and 2.25% on refinances. They also imposed an annual premium of .50% which affects a borrowers monthly payment.

Very few lenders have opened the doors back up on Section 502 loans. I would expect that to change before the fiscal year ends.

 

Today, the Federal Reserve published clarification on the changes that will be made to loan officer compensation in the mortgage industry. Loan officers employed by mortgage brokerages currently receive compensation by raising an interest rate in exchange for a rebate called yield spread premium. They can also be paid by charging up-front fees. Some loan officers employed by mortgage banks receive compensation by raising an interest rate in exchange for a rebate called service release premium. Although there is, a difference between yield spread and service release premium, they both result in paying a loan officer in exchange for selling a higher rate to a consumer. 

 

Yield spread premiums will be eliminated. Service release premiums will not. However, a loan officer will no longer set the rates with consumers, the mortgage bank will, and the mortgage bank will receive the entire service release premium if they sell the loan. Some mortgage banks already compensate loan officers based on a percentage of volume. In other words, a flat percentage of the total dollar amount of all loans closed. This results in the banks making most of the money while paying the loan officer very little versus loan officers being compensated with yield spread or service release premium. 

This all will take effect on April 1, 2011 and there really is very limited information available at this time. 

Another practice that will no longer exist is steering consumers into products that pay higher compensation. In my career, I never saw a high-risk product compensate more than a low risk product but I imagine somewhere it must have occurred. 

The existence of mortgage brokerages will be threatened, and the number in existence has already been greatly reduced. It will become very difficult for mortgage brokers to compete in the market. It will also be hard for small companies to continue to exist. You should start to see companies transition into larger alliances to stay afloat. Competition will be significantly reduced, and another drop off in loan originator positions is to be expected. 

Other parts of bill S.3217 Restoring American Financial Stability Act of 2010 affecting the mortgage industry will be effective January 31, 2011. There will be a 90-day interim period then the revised disclosure requirements will become permanent. Some changes include disclosing worst-case scenario is on ARM loans, telling consumers refinancing or selling their home may be difficult, and higher standards for notifying consumers that their mortgage will be sold. 

I am still fuzzy on exactly what will happen with compensation. Loan officers will just have to wait and see what their companies are going to do. If I hear more I will publish it by commenting on this article, so be sure to read below.

Today, David H. Stevens, the Assistant Secretary for Housing, published a letter informing the mortgage industry of the intent to raise annual mortgage insurance premiums on FHA loans. On loan terms over 15 years, the rate for LTV’s under 95% will raise from .50% to .85%. For LTV’s over 95% the premium will raise from .55% to .90%. Terms of less than 15 years will remain the same.

They will also reduce the up front mortgage insurance premium down to 1% on all loans.

It is their intent to make this effective on September 7, 2010. The change relies on the passage of H.R. 5981 which allows them the ability to increase these premiums up to a maximum of 1.55%.

Here is a scenario of how this change affects a borrower who is taking a loan for $97,750 on a home worth $100,000.

Current:

$97,750 plus 2.25% for up front mortgage insurance equals a total loan amount of $99,949.37. The monthly amount for mortgage insurance at .55% would start at $45.81. An estimated principle and interest payment at 4.5% over 30 years would be $506.42

Total principle and interest plus monthly mortgage insurance is $552.23

Proposed:

$97,750 plus 2.25% for up front mortgage insurance equals a total loan amount of $98,727.50. The monthly amount for mortgage insurance at .90% would start at $74.04. An estimated principle and interest payment at 4.5% over 30 years would be $500.23.

Total principle and interest plus monthly mortgage insurance is $574.28

As you can see the overall cost will be less up front but more monthly.

Update: On August 10, 2010 Vicki Bott published a letter stating these changes will not go into effect until October 4, 2010. She sites lenders not having enough time to implement system changes as a reason for the extension.

These changes will go into effect on all new case number’s pulled on October 4, 2010 and after.

Update: FHA published the mortgagee letter explaining these changes.

President Obama signed this bill into law today. It is the biggest financial reform bill passed since the great depression. The Senate passed this bill on a 59 to 39 back on May 20, 2010. The bill is over 800 pages! It is intended to stop the bleeding on Wall Street by imposing tougher regulations. It will affect business both large and small. There is so much in the bill it would take a 1600 page blog post to explain it all!

Status Update: Mortgage Rates

Posted: 17th June 2010 by Greg Phillips in Mortgage Related

Over the years there have been small periods where mortgage rates fall below the 5% threshold on 30 year fixed programs. They generally last only hours or days at a time. People hear about them and inquire too late and they disappear.

December of 2008 we had a spurt that lasted maybe a day. Then in February of 2009 another serious swing that was around for a little under a week.

I chose to publish this article because rates have been below 5% on many programs for over 2 weeks now. I have been contacting all of my past clients letting them know the good news. Some have been able to drop their rates over 1% or even 2%. Others have seen very slight increases in payment to go from a 30 year term to a 15 year.

Now is a good time to inquire about refinancing! The stock market is losing so that shifts some of the demand over to mortgage bonds. When mortgage bonds do good rates can go down.